When Arsenal's offense hums, playmaker Mesut Özil orchestrates it.
But neither he nor the team got into a rhythm in Saturday’s 1-1 draw
with Manchester United. The Gunners’ inability to register a shot on
target until Olivier Giroud’s equalizer in the 89th minute seems like clear proof of the team’s ineffectiveness on the day.
Combine
that reality with the hosts’ crisper passing and effective defending,
and you get a rather unpleasant display for Arsenal fans. A pleasing
result, no doubt, but not with the aesthetic quality we would like to
see.
Pause from the monocause
As ever in
this era of reductive outrage, many observers laid the responsibility at
the feet of either Özil or Aaron Ramsey. The attacking midfielders
carried the creative potential in this particular starting XI; the other
members of the front six tended to the direct (Alexis, Theo Walcott) or
the risk managers (Francis Coquelin, Mohammed Elneny).
It’s true
that neither Özil nor Ramsey created a chance for a teammate. Between
them, they completed only one pass in the opposition penalty area. And
neither took a shot.
So at one level you can see why Arsenal’s two talents took criticism for the pedestrian display overall.
But those complaints, true to our age, oversimplify complex developments.
Kelly Wood’s defense of Ramsey, “Aaron Ramsey! He is Great,”
hammers the Ramsey critics effectively, so I won’t restate her points
here. What I will do instead is try to understand the dynamics that
brought on this performance, particularly from Özil.
So, what’s Özil’s scenario?
First,
the statistics don’t reveal anything out of the ordinary. Özil
completed 58 passes against Manchester United, just one fewer than his
season average. His passing accuracy of 86 percent was only one
percentage point lower than his norm so far this year.
The
difference was where Özil did this work. Instead of combining with
Alexis and Walcott on the edge or in Manchester United’s penalty area,
the German playmaker operated much closer to midfield. The heat maps on whoscored.com
show Özil frequenting the middle third. That was a change of his sphere
of influence, given that he’s one of the Premier League’s most prolific
final-third passers.
Not only did this shift of activity take
Özil away from where he’s most dangerous, it jammed him into an area
where others were operating. In particular, Alexis dropped deep from his
center forward position to receive the ball—note the overlap with Özil
on the heat map.
Rather than creating triangles to facilitate
quick passing, the Gunners’ close proximity to each other in midfield
allowed Manchester United’s midfielders to clog the spaces.
There was another team on the pitch
That was central to Jose Mourinho’s brutal design.
The
Manchester United manager set out to deny Özil opportunities on the
ball. The German genius often found himself surrounded by three
opposition players—center backs Marcos Rojo and Phil Jones pushing up
and midfielder Michael Carrick shielding passes into him. When he
ventured to the left, right back Antonio Valencia and a central
midfielder usually had him cornered.
Loosening these defensive
shackles proved difficult. It required guile and skill from Özil's
midfield teammates or a dangerous distraction elsewhere.
For all
their positive qualities and contributions, Coquelin and Elneny could
not provide the craft to free Özil. The central pair focused on breaking
up the hosts’ attacks and making the simple pass out. These two
responsibilities were difficult enough, what with the harassment they
received from Ander Herrera.
To find the well-marshalled Özil, they needed more daring.
Creative
responsibility wasn’t their brief, though, as manager Arsène Wenger
admitted afterward. “I knew it would be a bit more of a physical battle,
so I chose players who have experience and fight,” he told Arsenal.com.
Method to the midfield
There’s
a logic to this approach. Many factors weighed against Arsenal in this
match, even if this wasn’t the most fearsome Manchester United lineup of
all time.
Early kickoff. Return from the international break. The
Mourinho hoodoo. A 10-year league victory drought at Old Trafford.
Injuries to dynamic players like Hector Bellerin and Santi Cazorla.
In
that context, you can understand a more circumspect approach from
Arsenal. Wenger was right that midfield robustness was important; it’s
just that his charges didn’t cope superbly with the aggressiveness of
Manchester United in that area of the pitch.
They handled it well
enough to get a draw. If the players’ post-game comments are a true
indication, they’ll be honest in their assessment of the performance and
optimistic that better outings lie ahead.
Arsenal’s visit to Manchester United on Sunday commences a defining ten-day stretch.
Between February 28th and March 8th,
the Gunners will play four matches. Their three Premier League
encounters with Manchester United, Swansea, and Tottenham are separated
by just three days each. Then, three days after the North London Derby,
Arsenal travel to Hull for a replay of the FA Cup 5th Round match, seeking to advance toward an historic third consecutive trophy in that competition.
The
league matches—two at the grounds of other top-five sides--present a
challenge that a title-winning team must rise to. As manager Arsène
Wenger said,
“It is the key period. We work the whole season for this period and
that’s where you’re really tested, but it’s where you have an
opportunity to show your quality as well. On that front, that is the
most interesting period of the season.”
So far, Arsenal have fared
well against direct rivals for the league crown, having won four, drawn
one, and lost none against Leicester City, Tottenham, Manchester City,
and Manchester United.
Four of those five matches were at home,
however, including the 3-0 thrashing of Sunday’s opponents in early
October. How instructive will we find that contest in our efforts to
understand what might happen on Sunday?
In brief, Arsenal had the right tactical plan that day and the personnel to execute it; Manchester United did not. (See Arsenal’s Tactical Triumph for more detail.)
But
the personnel will definitely change on Sunday, and the plans will
probably shift, too. Both teams have suffered injuries to vital players.
For Arsenal, the most telling loss has been that of Santi Cazorla, the
architect of the October victory. His ability to dance out of the
visitors’ midfield pressure in the first half opened the attacking space
that Arsenal exploited.
In response to Cazorla’s absence,
Manchester United manager Louis van Gaal may again decide to press
Arsenal’s midfield. That’s a tactic most opponents have tried since
Cazorla’s November knee injury, and Arsenal have often sputtered as a
result. Van Gaal does have two players, Morgan Schneiderlin and Ander
Herrera, who can harry the Arsenal midfield.
The problem is that
pressing requires synchronization, persistence, conditioning, and a
strong last line of defense. The Red Devils have not had a settled
midfield since the turn of the year, raising questions about both their
ability to coordinate the press and their capacity to stick to the
physical and mental task. Furthermore, due to injuries across the back
four, the United defense lacks stability.
Given those factors, van
Gaal may opt for the risk-averse, possession game that has
characterized much of his team’s play this season. With Michael Carrick
and Juan Mata, United do have the players to implement this approach.
How aggressively and effectively Arsenal disrupt the hosts’ efforts in
this respect will influence the dynamics of the match.
Its
outcome, though, will probably be decided up front. Manchester United
lack a proven match-winner because Wayne Rooney is out with injury;
Arsenal don’t have a player in any kind of goal-scoring form. Indeed,
the Gunners have been held scoreless in five of their last eight
matches. So both teams could stumble at the critical moment in front of
goal.
If Arsenal can convert just one of the many chances it might
get—as the league’s most creative team in terms of clear goal-scoring
opportunities—that could do the trick. And at the outset of this
critical sequence of matches, a positive result is all that matters.
Key Matchup
Aaron
Ramsey against the Manchester United midfield. Restored to his
preferred position in central midfield, Arsenal’s Welshman has performed
creditably. Perhaps those performances haven’t met expectations, but
were those expectations reasonable? As Tim Stillman observes in his
Arseblog column “Sacrificial Ram,”
Ramsey has been doing three jobs at once, supporting his deep-lying
midfield partner, making up for the absence of a ball-control specialist
on the right, and sparking Arsenal’s preference for attacking to the
left.
Ramsey will face skillful and intelligent opponents in
Scheiderlin and Herrera. The extent to which he can slip their
attentions and initiate Arsenal’s attacks will shape Arsenal’s threat
overall.
Where to Worry
Arsenal’s defensive
focus flagged on just a few occasions against Barcelona on Tuesday
evening. Two of those lapses proved fatal. The injury-riddled Manchester
United don’t possess the proven attacking threats of Barcelona—no team
does, in truth—but at this level, with these stakes, the slightest
mental error can be a killer. Wenger and his team will need to turn all
their attentions to the task at hand on Sunday.
Match Verdict
Most
of the accomplished talent on display will be in the midfield, with
Manchester United’s Schneiderlin, Herrera, and Juan Mata facing off
against Ramsey, Mesut Özil, and Alexis Sanchez. Those two trios will be
at the center of the action, but this one comes down to the two
defenses. Arsenal’s, anchored by the impressive Petr Cech, has been more
stable than Manchester United’s, who may have to cope without its
standout keeper David de Gea.
Despite the Gunners’ recent goal-scoring
struggles, their chances of getting an unmissable opportunity against
Manchester United’s makeshift back line seem strong.
Players to Watch
Arsenal. Danny Welbeck. The
ex-Manchester United man has looked lively and dangerous since his
return from injury. He’s shown he can rise to the occasion—both here in
last season’s FA Cup quarterfinal and in his match-winning substitute
appearance against Leicester City two weeks ago. If he’s physically
ready, he merits a start, and that can’t be a tantalizing prospect for
these opposition defenders.
Manchester United. Juan Mata.
The Spaniard now pulls the strings for Manchester United, a role that
suits him. He can also find dangerous spaces in the opponents’ penalty
area, avoiding the attentions of defenders and midfielders. Arsenal’s
Francis Coquelin will need to be especially diligent tracking Mata’s
movements.
While we marvel in the sublime skill and breathtaking speed Arsenal
displayed against Manchester United on Sunday, we should also praise the
team’s tactical triumph. The flexibility that manager Arsène Wenger and
his players displayed bamboozled the visitors and their supposed
tactical genius of a manager, Louis van Gaal.
In fact, van Gaal’s
approach played right into Arsenal’s hands, permitting the Gunners to
emphasize their strengths and to exploit Manchester United’s weaknesses.
Once Arsenal had secured the three-goal advantage, they adapted to
various situations and remained the superior force.
Let’s look at how the game plans unfolded.
Early onslaught
Arsenal
showed every intention of starting the match assertively. This not only
represented a response to the poor midweek showing in the Champions
League against Olympiacos, but it also conformed to the patterns of this
Premier League season. In particular, the home team takes the
initiative early to gain the superiority it needs to play on the
counterattack. (See Danny Higginbotham’s column in The Independent for a clear explanation of this trend.)
Two
goals before the 10-minute mark are the proof Arsenal succeeded. Here’s
evidence of the intention: Deep-lying midfielder Francis Coquelin’s
position just before Alexis Sanchez opened the scoring.
Coquelin
helps start the attack, then follows Hector Bellerin and Mesut Özil up
the right side of the pitch into an advanced position for a defensive
midfielder. From where he is, he can trouble three of United’s possible
escape routes, via Wayne Rooney, Bastian Schweinsteiger, or Memphis
Depay.

- Coquelin joins attack but positions himself to thwart any possible United counter-attack
As
it happens, Manchester United does intercept Bellerin’s centering pass,
but Coquelin beats Memphis to the ball and gets it back to Özil. That’s
when Özil’s quick interchange with Aaron Ramsey and sprint to the
byline scramble the Manchester defense and create the scoring
opportunity.
Manchester United’s susceptibility
The buildup to this play also reveals Manchester United’s vulnerability and the flaws of its game plan.
Van
Gaal apparently decided to man-mark Arsenal in the center of the pitch.
Schweinsteiger covered Santi Cazorla, Rooney was assigned Coquelin, and
Michael Carrick was on Özil.

- United's man marking the midfield put them at a distinct disadvantage in controlling the match
This
setup handed the initiative to Arsenal. Schweinsteiger is 31 years old;
Cazorla is only a year younger but a magician with the ball. Rooney is
29; Coquelin, 24. Carrick is 34; Ozil, 26. Add the speed of thought and
passing to the age difference, and Arsenal were just too quick in the
midfield.
A word here, too, about the role of Per Mertesacker.
Schweinsteiger leaves Cazorla and tries to close down the Arsenal
captain, but Mertesacker outfoxes him with a one-touch pass to Coquelin,
who has eluded Rooney. This springs the attack.
Flailing fullbacks
Another
consequence of Manchester United’s man-marking in the midfield was that
its fullbacks had very little support defending the spaces on the
flanks. Alexis took advantage of this situation, running Matteo Darmian
ragged.
The situation titled even more favorably toward Arsenal
because Manchester United central defenders Chris Smalling and, in
particular, Daley Blind were sensitive to the threat of Theo Walcott.
Walcott’s speed and movement upset the defensive balance and, just
before the third Arsenal goal, forced Darmian into a narrow position,
leaving Alexis free to receive Walcott’s pass and move into a
threatening position with the ball. (See Adrian Clark's analysis of this
passage of play on The Breakdown on the official Arsenal website.)
With
Ashley Young defending like a winger playing fullback on Manchester
United's left, the effectiveness of Arsenal’s Bellerin and Nacho Monreal
was a stark contrast.
Consolidation
Immediately
after Alexis drove home his second goal of the first 20 minutes,
Arsenal’s objective changed. A three-goal lead made controlling
dangerous spaces the priority. Manchester United’s ponderous play helped
Arsenal in this respect, as did the shift to a 4-4-1-1 formation.
Coquelin
and Cazorla moved together closer to the center of the pitch and
Arsenal’s center backs, while Alexis and Ramsey dropped deeper from
their attacking initial positions.

- Arsenal move to a 4-4-1-1 to protect the lead
Alexis
is slightly advanced here because he’s engaging Darmian on Arsenal’s
left, but overall this is the compact shape Arsenal used to protect its
lead and start further counterattacks.
It’s a perfect response to
the game situation, Arsenal having earned the right to play on the
counter with its early three-goal blitz.
Adaptation
At
halftime, Van Gaal replaced Darmian with Antonio Valencia and Memphis
with Marouane Fellaini. The latter brought his
physical-bordering-on-fouly presence into the center of midfield. This
change spurred the visitors to become more assertive in midfield,
creating two shots on target midway through the half.
Wenger and
his team adapted. He instructed Ramsey to leave his post on the right
and join Coquelin and Cazorla in the center of midfield. Özil went
right, and Arsenal took a 4-3-3 shape.

- Ramsey tucks in to form a 4-3-3 to adjust to United's halftime changes
This adjustment largely succeeded in upsetting Manchester United’s rhythm.
Later,
Wenger made one final shift, introducing the more physical center
forward presence of Olivier Giroud and returning to the 4-2-3-1 shape
from which Arsenal had started the match. Only this time, Ramsey took
the playmaker role and joined Giroud in defending from the front of the
formation. Substitute Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain became the main threat on
the counterattack, nearly capping the scoring with a chip off the bar in
injury time.
Had that gone in, the final score of 4-0 would not
have flattered Arsenal. With a clear game plan, tactical flexibility,
expert execution, a focused mentality, and physical commitment, the
Gunners dispatched one of its bogey teams and made manifest their
potential to mount a title challenge.
(Graphics courtesy YouAreMyArsenal)
Arsenal's visit to Old Trafford won't carry the drama that seemed
likely when the fixture list was released. Originally the penultimate
match of the league campaign, the contest could have decided the two
sides' Champions League fates or one of their title aspirations.
Neither
remains in the balance. Arsenal have already amassed enough points to
secure a top-four league finish, while United would have to give up a
plus-14 advantage in goal differential to lose its own Champions League
spot. Meanwhile, Chelsea have won the title.
The two teams won't
hold any major surprises for each other, either. They met two months ago
in the FA Cup quarterfinal, a 2-1 Arsenal victory that signaled further
improvement against top competition away from home.
Still, no Arsenal-Manchester United contest is devoid of drama, and this one will be interesting on several levels.
For
one thing, the implications for the final league table remain
important. Arsenal need a win to maintain any hope of finishing second,
which was a realistic--and stated--objective prior to Monday's loss to
Swansea. A victory would also guarantee the Gunners third place and a
pass on next season's Champions League qualifying round.
A United
victory keeps open the possibility of a third-place finish for Louis Van
Gaal's team, while a draw would give Van Gaal the points for a
fourth-place finish and Arsenal almost all it needs for third. It'd be
out of character for both Van Gaal and Arsenal manager Arsène Wenger to
play for that result, so their approaches will be interesting in light
of their objectives for the season.
Second, this is the final
opportunity for Arsenal to consolidate its away performances against top
opposition. The victory at Manchester City, the FA Cup win at Old
Trafford, and to some degree the loss at Chelsea have shown that Arsenal
are no longer naive travelers.
Although Arsenal played
energetically in all three matches, the manager and the team did not
take a uniform approach. They placed priority on solid defending in
their own half against City and Chelsea, while they pressed United's
midfielders and defenders assertively.
Lacking Michael Carrick's
ball retention and passing efficiency due to his injury, is United
vulnerable to a similar pressing approach on Sunday? Or will Wenger see
West Bromich Albion's and Chelsea's recent rear-guard victories over
United and his side's result at Manchester City as suggesting a more
defensive stature? Will Wayne Rooney's exclusion bear on the Arsenal
manager's thinking at all?
All those questions lead to a third
interesting point. Based on Wenger's priorities for this match and his
judgment of how to realize those, which players does he select? The team
looked less than energetic against Swansea, particularly in the first
half, and there may be a temptation to bring some variety to the lineup.
After all, it was the fifth consecutive appearance for the identical
starting eleven, an unprecedented run in Wenger's tenure.
Midfielders
Jack Wilshere and Tomas Rosicky are the most likely candidates to join
the starters. They'd each add verve to the Arsenal attack, though Wenger
will weigh their energy going forward with defensive necessities. In
particular, Arsenal's right-sided attacker will have to assist right
back Hector Bellerin in marshaling United's Ashley Young, a primary
agent of Van Gaal's directive to send crosses into the opposition's
penalty area.
A healthy Danny Welbeck or Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain
might have expected to join the Arsenal XI because they'd bring speed in
attack and defensive tenacity, but neither is ready to return to the
scene of his outstanding FA Cup performance.
Even without
Welbeck's desire to show his old employers again what they've forsaken,
and even without the high stakes these encounters have carried in the
past, Arsenal-Manchester United will always have its intrigues. It's
each club's most prominent fixture as the season draws to a close, so
the result could shape the storylines and tone for several months. Worth
the attention.