It's tough to reflect on Arsenal's 2-0 defeat at Chelsea and draw wisdom.
The
match turned from an interesting, cagey affair to an utter farce just
before halftime, when the spotlight-seeking referee Mike Dean took the
opportunity to expel Arsenal center half Gabriel.
Still, let's consider these three conclusions that emerged from the encounter.
Arsenal don't have the margin of safety to buffer it against awful officiating
This
is the second straight match in which Arsenal players have seen red
cards. After Olivier Giroud's expulsion in the Champions League on
Wednesday, both Gabriel and Santi Cazorla were sent off against Chelsea.
Like most teams, Arsenal have struggled with the subsequent disadvantage.
That's the hard--and perhaps not very revelatory--truth.
There
are some interesting aspects of this reality, though. Often a team's
fans will rail at unjust officiating and say that it cost their team the
game, but in many cases they're just looking for an outside scapegoat
for their team's inadequate performance.
In this case, Arsenal
fans are right to identify Saturday's referee as decisive. And just
about any reasonably impartial observer would have to agree: The
unwillingness or inability to punish Diego Costa properly, the failure
to defuse the Gabriel-Diego Costa confrontation, and several other key
borderline calls tilted this match in Chelsea's favor.
This
experience, coming just after an encounter with another inept, touchy,
or easily influenced match official in Zagreb, should serve as a lesson
to Arsenal's players and staff: They're likely to face injustice; their
task is to minimize its effects.
Succeeding in that situation will
require extraordinary intelligence, mental fortitude, and balance.
It'll also take leadership, which both Francis Coquelin (a second too
late) and Nacho Monreal (rebuffed by the referee) tried to exercise on
Saturday. I wonder if Per Mertesaker's or Mikel Arteta's presence on the
pitch would have made a difference, recognizing, of course, that
Mertesacker's presence might have meant Gabriel was on the bench rather
than in the heat of the action.
Now we've seen the consequences
when Arsenal don't exercise the "soft skills," as opposed to the
physical skills, at this highest level of performance, and they're
unpleasant.
Arsenal can execute the necessary tactical plan
Before the incident that changed the match, Arsenal showed its tactical flexibility, adapting the approach to fit the occasion.
Early
on, the movement of Arsenal's forwards caused Chelsea some discomfort.
When that activity didn't create the important early goal, the focus
shifted to keeping Chelsea at bay.
This succeeded. Chelsea had
only four shots on target in the first half, and just one of those,
Pedro's smothered connection with a lofted pass to the far post, was
inside Arsenal's penalty area.
Overall, even with a man and then
two-man disadvantage, Arsenal conceded just two of what StatsZone calls
"big chances" in front of goal, the Pedro shot saved by Petr Cech in the
first half and Kurt Zouma's headed goal in the 53rd minute.
The
approach was similar to the one Arsenal executed in winning at
Manchester City last January. Saturday had the makings of another
tactical masterclass but for the referee's intervention.
Alexis needs to lift off
When
Arsenal could not identify, recruit, and attract a world-beating center
forward this offseason, just about everyone acknowledged that the team
would need a diverse supply of goals. Midfielders such as Aaron Ramsey
and Mesut Özil would have to contribute more, Theo Walcott and Danny
Welbeck would need to stay healthy and be more productive, and Alexis,
last season's top scorer, would have to add to his goal tally.
That mix certainly hasn't come together yet this season, and it's missing the key ingredient from Alexis.
It's
not for lack of trying. Alexis ran himself to the limit on Saturday,
coming off after 75 minutes. But when presented with Arsenal's one big
chance of the match, he wobbled, missing the target from pointblank
range not long after Zouma's opening goal.
That was Arsenal's
chance to change the dynamic of the match -- despite the numerical
disadvantage -- and the star man did not take it.
Whether he
returned too quickly from leading Chile to the Copa America, whether his
unrelenting schedule of the past two years has taken a toll, whether he
just needs one shot to go in to get himself going -- Alexis needs a
boost if Arsenal are to achieve their objectives.
Extra time
Arsenal
showed its mettle by standing up to Chelsea's bullies. The response
might not have been sufficiently cunning, but we can't question the
passion. Wednesday's Capital One Cup tie against Tottenham presents an
excellent opportunity to channel that spirit.
Arsenal dominated Stoke Saturday but had to wait until Olivier Giroud's 85th minute header to secure a 2-0 home win.
The
Gunners struggled in front of goal, with several shocking misses among
the 27 attempts that did not find the net, but that's no revelation at
this point. Here are three things we learned instead.
Maybe atypical goals should become the objective
When
Arsenal's goal-scoring form wanes, the team often intensifies its
efforts to execute the perfect pass-and-move action. We saw this in the
last Premier League outing against 10-man Newcastle, which Arsenal won
by virtue of an own goal.
There were a few occasions against Stoke
when similar attacks were unsuccessful, most notably the one-two
between Santi Cazorla and Mesut Özil that sent the German through with
only Stoke keeper Jack Butland to beat. Özil tried unsuccessfully to
coax the ball past Butland at the near post.
Arsenal succeeded,
though, with different approaches. The first goal was a long-range
counterattack, commenced by a Francis Coquelin tackle in the Arsenal
half and served up by a wonderful long pass from Özil to Theo Walcott.
Walcott exploited Stoke's relatively high line, found just enough space,
and rolled the ball under the onrushing Butland.
The second goal
came from a Cazorla free kick and an accurate header by Giroud, who had
eased between two dozy Stoke defenders. The free kick resulted from
muscular play by Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain, who drew a foul from Stoke's
Phil Bardsley in a threatening area.
Again, the source of the play
was not an intricate Arsenal move. Perhaps this diversified approach to
goal is worth more attention.
Gabriel brings the pain
The
Brazilian earned his third consecutive start in the center of the
Arsenal defense and gave as good as he got with Stoke's physical
forwards. The highlight, of course, was his second-half tussle with
villain Marco Arnautevic, the culprit in Arsenal right back Mathieu
Debuchy's shoulder separation last spring.
This time, Arnautevic
fared worse. He clearly initiated the set-to with Gabriel, throwing an
elbow and then a forearm into Gabriel's face as they chased down a ball.
Gabriel fended off the second blow and, in one motion, clocked
Arnautevic across the face.
The arm of justice.
It was just
the most notable of Gabriel's successful interventions. He and Laurent
Koscielny marshaled Stoke's rare attacks well, save for one loose headed
clearance by Koscielny. Their quickness and physicality give opposition
forwards a tough time.
On these performances, Per Mertesacker
faces a real challenge to break back into to the starting lineup,
especially if Koscielny's passing continues to improve. The Frenchman
was Arsenal's top passer against Stoke, completing 75 of 83 passes.
(Stats via FourFourTwo's StatsZone app.)
Arsenal have two point guards to lead a transition offense
The
selection of Theo Walcott at center forward, coupled with Stoke's
decision to push defenders slightly higher up the pitch, created
excellent conditions for Arsenal's two skilled playmakers to shine.
Santi Cazorla and Özil did.
Playing deep in midfield, Cazorla
shook off some indifferent recent performances and showed his quality,
particularly in the first half. He spotted runs by Walcott and Aaron
Ramsey and launched pinpoint long passes to each of his teammates.
In
the second half, Cazorla was at his dancing best, avoiding the
inevitable Stoke challenges, getting himself into dangerous positions,
and launching four shots, two quite threatening. His assist to Giroud
and a similarly precise free kick to Koscielny in the waning minutes
were two of the seven chances he created for teammates.
Meanwhile,
Özil made the decisive impact with his assist for Walcott's opening
goal. That pass, so quickly made after Coquelin had won the ball, caught
Stoke off guard because they had moved slightly forward, thinking the
biggest risk was a more involved Arsenal build-up. It was the most
eye-catching and important of the eight chances Özil created in the
match.
Extra Time: Arsenal's fullback combination is tough to beat
When
Stoke manager Mark Hughes sent Xherdan Shaqiri and Arnautevic out as
his wide forwards, he handed the initiative to Arsenal's fullbacks
Hector Bellerin and Nacho Monreal. They took it and ran.
Bellerin
attempted 20 passes in the final third, completing 17 of them (85
percent) and creating four scoring chances for teammates. His cross to
Walcott in the first half really deserved a better finish.
Monreal
posted less impressive attacking numbers, but he identified the gaps in
Stoke's defense and made runs to exploit the openings. His work in the
air, winning three of three duels against an historically airborne
opponent, suggests that he could also be a worthy outlet (as Bacary
Sagna was) for the goalkeeper's kicks in Giroud's absence.