It's tough to reflect on Arsenal's 2-0 defeat at Chelsea and draw wisdom.
The
match turned from an interesting, cagey affair to an utter farce just
before halftime, when the spotlight-seeking referee Mike Dean took the
opportunity to expel Arsenal center half Gabriel.
Still, let's consider these three conclusions that emerged from the encounter.
Arsenal don't have the margin of safety to buffer it against awful officiating
This
is the second straight match in which Arsenal players have seen red
cards. After Olivier Giroud's expulsion in the Champions League on
Wednesday, both Gabriel and Santi Cazorla were sent off against Chelsea.
Like most teams, Arsenal have struggled with the subsequent disadvantage.
That's the hard--and perhaps not very revelatory--truth.
There
are some interesting aspects of this reality, though. Often a team's
fans will rail at unjust officiating and say that it cost their team the
game, but in many cases they're just looking for an outside scapegoat
for their team's inadequate performance.
In this case, Arsenal
fans are right to identify Saturday's referee as decisive. And just
about any reasonably impartial observer would have to agree: The
unwillingness or inability to punish Diego Costa properly, the failure
to defuse the Gabriel-Diego Costa confrontation, and several other key
borderline calls tilted this match in Chelsea's favor.
This
experience, coming just after an encounter with another inept, touchy,
or easily influenced match official in Zagreb, should serve as a lesson
to Arsenal's players and staff: They're likely to face injustice; their
task is to minimize its effects.
Succeeding in that situation will
require extraordinary intelligence, mental fortitude, and balance.
It'll also take leadership, which both Francis Coquelin (a second too
late) and Nacho Monreal (rebuffed by the referee) tried to exercise on
Saturday. I wonder if Per Mertesaker's or Mikel Arteta's presence on the
pitch would have made a difference, recognizing, of course, that
Mertesacker's presence might have meant Gabriel was on the bench rather
than in the heat of the action.
Now we've seen the consequences
when Arsenal don't exercise the "soft skills," as opposed to the
physical skills, at this highest level of performance, and they're
unpleasant.
Arsenal can execute the necessary tactical plan
Before the incident that changed the match, Arsenal showed its tactical flexibility, adapting the approach to fit the occasion.
Early
on, the movement of Arsenal's forwards caused Chelsea some discomfort.
When that activity didn't create the important early goal, the focus
shifted to keeping Chelsea at bay.
This succeeded. Chelsea had
only four shots on target in the first half, and just one of those,
Pedro's smothered connection with a lofted pass to the far post, was
inside Arsenal's penalty area.
Overall, even with a man and then
two-man disadvantage, Arsenal conceded just two of what StatsZone calls
"big chances" in front of goal, the Pedro shot saved by Petr Cech in the
first half and Kurt Zouma's headed goal in the 53rd minute.
The
approach was similar to the one Arsenal executed in winning at
Manchester City last January. Saturday had the makings of another
tactical masterclass but for the referee's intervention.
Alexis needs to lift off
When
Arsenal could not identify, recruit, and attract a world-beating center
forward this offseason, just about everyone acknowledged that the team
would need a diverse supply of goals. Midfielders such as Aaron Ramsey
and Mesut Özil would have to contribute more, Theo Walcott and Danny
Welbeck would need to stay healthy and be more productive, and Alexis,
last season's top scorer, would have to add to his goal tally.
That mix certainly hasn't come together yet this season, and it's missing the key ingredient from Alexis.
It's
not for lack of trying. Alexis ran himself to the limit on Saturday,
coming off after 75 minutes. But when presented with Arsenal's one big
chance of the match, he wobbled, missing the target from pointblank
range not long after Zouma's opening goal.
That was Arsenal's
chance to change the dynamic of the match -- despite the numerical
disadvantage -- and the star man did not take it.
Whether he
returned too quickly from leading Chile to the Copa America, whether his
unrelenting schedule of the past two years has taken a toll, whether he
just needs one shot to go in to get himself going -- Alexis needs a
boost if Arsenal are to achieve their objectives.
Extra time
Arsenal
showed its mettle by standing up to Chelsea's bullies. The response
might not have been sufficiently cunning, but we can't question the
passion. Wednesday's Capital One Cup tie against Tottenham presents an
excellent opportunity to channel that spirit.
Arsenal's 1-0 victory over Chelsea in Sunday's Community Shield capped a perfect pre-season in fine style.
The
sun shone on Wembley, supporters were in mid-season voice, Alex
Oxlade-Chamberlain delivered a lovely goal, and Chelsea manager José
Mourinho was irritated. In other words, success.
Although we
shouldn't draw any definitive conclusions from the match, we can make
some inferences to guide our thinking in advance of next Sunday's
Premier League opener against West Ham. Here are three things that stuck
out:
1. This team can adapt to the occasion
Arsenal
showed it knows more than one way to achieve its objectives. As in last
season's watershed victory at Manchester City, the Gunners conceded
much of the possession to accomplished opponents, rather than taking a
more assertive offensive approach. Chelsea had 57 percent possession to
Arsenal's 43 percent. (Stats from Opta via whoscored.com.)
Manager Arsène Wenger praised this tactical move, suggesting in his post-match press conference
that the players made this adjustment. "They were more concerned with
protecting our lead against Chelsea rather than playing attacking
football," he said. "We have to accept that, and I don’t think that’s
giving up your philosophy, it’s a punctual fact that we wanted to win a
game like that. I’m quite proud of that."
It wasn't a physical,
rear-guard defense that suggested a huge gap in quality between the
sides; Arsenal simply controlled the passing lanes with a midfield line
that made the most of the energy of Francis Coquelin and Aaron Ramsey.
The setup started out like the 4-1-4-1 that manager Arsène Wenger had
introduced early in the 2014-15 campaign, then after
Oxlade-Chamberlain's goal it often looked like a 4-4-1-1 with Mesut Özil
just behind Theo Walcott.
The personnel is already flexible, too.
Santi Cazorla occupied the left of the midfield, a position he hadn't
taken up for at least a year, and Ramsey returned to the center of
midfield, his preferred spot but not one where he's regularly featured
since the middle of last season. Top scorer Alexis will eventually
return, and the players will shift again.
Indeed, adaptability --
both in the starting lineups and in the positioning of players in games
-- could be a feature of the season. Wenger has the opportunity to vary
his selections to fit the opposition because the players at his
disposal, in just about every position, are of high quality.
2. This defense looks ready and savvy
Arsenal
conceded just one goal in five pre-season matches, as a variety of
defenders and goalkeepers, not including last season's eventual first
choice David Ospina, shut down several dangerous opponents.
On
Sunday, Chelsea managed two shots on target. They had two other real
opportunities, Ramires's first-half header and Eden Hazard's rushed sky
job in the second half, but Arsenal's efforts rendered Chelsea's offense
largely ineffective. The midfield's work in the passing lanes stymied
Cesc Fabregas, and when Chelsea did reach the spaces just outside the
penalty area, where they were most dangerous last season, Arsenal
crowded the space and blocked any progress.
Longer approaches were
handled by Arsenal center-half Laurent Koscielny. He seemed in top
form, shepherding Chelsea's front men and attending to any danger.
Koscielny made 16 clearances and won four aerial duels, both top figures
on the team.
With Koscielny, his central defensive partner Per
Mertesacker, and goalkeeper Petr Cech, Arsenal have an experienced,
knowledgeable defensive core. That's a strong foundation for a run at
the Premier League title.
3. Arsenal didn't act friendly
This
was an exhibition that Arsenal came to win. From the kickoff, the
Gunners asserted themselves and did not shirk the physical,
psychological, or tactical contests inherent in facing a Mourinho team.
That
willingness became especially evident late in the second half. Wenger's
substitutions were designed to shore up the defense: the more robust
Olivier Giroud for Theo Walcott, deep-lying midfielder Mikel Arteta for
playmaker Özil, and fullback Kieran Gibbs for Oxlade-Chamberlain. All
three made an impact, with Giroud and Gibbs threatening the Chelsea goal
and Arteta throwing himself into challenges, particularly with Chelsea
substitute Radamel Falcao.
Also noteworthy was left back Nacho
Monreal's canny professionalism. Twice in the first half, he got mixed
up with Chelsea's Gary Cahill, once resulting in a bloody nose and then
sending Cahill into teammate Branislav Ivanovic right at the Chelsea
post. Later, Monreal outmaneuvered Falcao (admittedly not a move with a
high degree of difficulty) to draw a foul that eased the pressure, and
he made a late clearance to kill even more time.
Applying this
savvy and effort in a so-called friendly shows how ready this team is
for the season ahead. Given Arsenal's talent, that application can put
Arsenal in position to defeat just about any opponent. In close matches
against top sides, they're required. Add a moment of brilliance, like
Sunday's from Oxlade-Chamberlain, and you've got a recipe for success.